Projects
Projects: Projects for Investigator |
||
| Reference Number | NIA2_SGN0056 | |
| Title | Interventions for Hydrogen by Asset Group Phase 3 | |
| Status | Completed | |
| Energy Categories | Hydrogen and Fuel Cells(Hydrogen, Other infrastructure and systems R&D) 100%; | |
| Research Types | Applied Research and Development 100% | |
| Science and Technology Fields | ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (Mechanical, Aeronautical and Manufacturing Engineering) 100% | |
| UKERC Cross Cutting Characterisation | Not Cross-cutting 100% | |
| Principal Investigator |
Project Contact SGN |
|
| Award Type | Network Innovation Allowance | |
| Funding Source | Ofgem | |
| Start Date | 01 September 2024 | |
| End Date | 31 March 2025 | |
| Duration | ENA months | |
| Total Grant Value | £254,000 | |
| Industrial Sectors | Energy | |
| Region | South East | |
| Programme | Network Innovation Allowance | |
| Investigators | Principal Investigator | Project Contact , SGN |
| Other Investigator | Project Contact , Cadent Central Project Contact , Cadent Eastern Project Contact , Cadent North London Project Contact , Cadent West Midlands Project Contact , Northern Gas Network (NGN) North East Project Contact , SGN - Southern England Project Contact , Cadent North West Project Contact , Wales and West Utilities |
|
| Industrial Collaborator | Project Contact , Northern Gas Networks Project Contact , SGN Project Contact , Cadent Gas Project Contact , Wales and West Utilities |
|
| Web Site | https://smarter.energynetworks.org/projects/NIA2_SGN0056 |
|
| Objectives | Phase 3 will continue the good work from the earlier phases and will involve two suppliers in Arup and DNV. Each supplier and the Networks will undertake different roles in the project.Arups approach:Establishing a collaborative working relationship with SGN, the Networks, ENA and DNV is key. Agreeing mutual outcomes and end goal objectives.Regular weekly progress meetings and reporting in addition to specific working meetings as required.To deliver our scope, Arup will need access to information:Latest version of the Asset Intervention Database in agreed SharePoint locationProject reports (primarily findings and conclusions) and project proformas - to be provided through the ENA or NetworksHSE Feedback, comments and sign off logs etc. from the HSE, that are related specifically to the project evidence that has been submitted to date.Any other relevant work/evidence e.g. international evidence to be provided by Networks.DNVs approach:DNV receipt of updated evidence and project kick-off (WP5 & WP6)DNV receives initial updated evidence recorded against assets (by theme and pressure tier) following completion of earlier work packages.Discuss any updates to structure and content of Database with subject matter experts (SMEs) responsible for completing work packages.Outline updated plan (based on actual start date).Agree sample data set to be assessed as a part of initial assessment milestone Note. The initial assessment is intended to confirm the process and format with the stakeholders prior to progressing with the remaining assessments.Assign evidence to SMEs for assessmentReview updated database and divide into relevant themes based on SMEs specific area of expertiseHold initial meetings with SMEs and agree assessment and review programme for assigned asset/theme/evidenceSubject matter experts undertake initial assessment of sample evidenceUndertake assessment of updated evidence for the agreed initial sample, including:Review new evidence: HyDeploy, MOBs, LTS Futures, HRC, cast ironReview outputs from International Evidence project and incorporate all relevant evidenceReview knowledge gaps, focus on critical evidence, identify potential replacement of assetsRecord assessment outputs in Database, including description of remaining gapsIssue updated Database containing initial sample assessments for optional review by Gas NetworksSubject matter experts undertake remaining assessments of evidence (repeat assessment process outlined in step 3)Issue updateddraft Database containing all assessments for optional review by Gas NetworksSMEs review and update assessment outputs following comments from Gas NetworksIssue updatedfinal Database containing amendments and comments response sheetCreate a list of assets which is prioritised based on the extent of evidence gaps in a format to be agreed with the Gas NetworksIssue the prioritised list to the HSEDevelop a short technical note containing the methodology, tasks completed, list of SMEs, high-level assessment outputs, and a record of correspondence with HSEHold a project close-out meeting to clarify that all deliverables have been provided.Measurement Quality StatementThe project will use the above approaches to ensure assessments follow quality assurance processes. All methods used will be clearly documented within the relevant deliverables and final project reports, which will be made available for review. This will include the procedures and techniques used, and mechanisms to ensure traceability, reliability and comparability of results.Data Quality StatementRegular meetings will be held with key stakeholders from each network and the two suppliers to agree the format for the sharing and storage of project data. This is important as it will allow the gas networks to demonstrate to DESNZ and Ofgem that there is no unnecessary duplication within the various hydrogen projects and trials, and justify any additional research required. DNVs involvement in the project will ensure a consistent approach in the presentation of the assessments and data due to their involvement in the previous phase of Asset Interventions. WP1: Ongoing management of the Asset Interventions database (Arup)Update of the format of the database to improve presentation and allow easier access to results and review of scoring:Arup will update the excel based database to allow easier navigation and access to data and ratings.Discussion will be held with SGN, the other Networks, DNV and the HSE to agree format change and requirements.Taking ownership of managing the database, controlling access to the SharePoint and version control:The live version of the database will be saved in an agreed SharePoint location with Arup having full access.During the project Arup will host the database and provide access as directed by the Networks. At the project end, the database will be handed back to the Networks. The Networks will then be responsible for providing access to those that require access.Adding new project and evidence to the database as provided by the Networks:Under WP3, the Networks will be reviewing ongoing and new projects and will provide information to Arup to include in the database.Arup will also consider how the project tables are formatted and accessed within the database. The format for adding international evidence will also be agreed with the Networks.In the database, update HSE Demonstration Points and NSI L2 sub-requirements:Demonstration Points and L2 references are to be provided by the Networks for the asset categories in the database.Project Matrix (developed as part of the current SGN-Arup Hydrogen Network Safety project) will also support in updating existing Demonstration Points in the database.WP2: Review of HSE feedback (Networks)Review of HSE comments logs and highlighting any knowledge gaps in the database:The Networks will carry out technical review of comments in the HSE comments log for their individual projects, identifying areas with gaps which are yet to be covered by other Network projects and evidence in the database.Any gaps will be discussed with other NSI project leads where required and reviewed against information in the database.Evidence gaps will be added into the database by the Networks for consideration and update of the scoring by DNV.WP3: Review of existing/ongoing evidence (Networks)Create specific evidence tables per project: HyDeploy, MOBs, LTS Futures, Hydrogen Ready Components (HRC) Phase 2, Cast Iron, and others:Arup will incorporate this into the database and ask for feedback on missing information, accuracy of evidence and correct alignment to themes/asset categories.WP4: Summary of evidence (Arup)Analyse the database to determine state of evidence and HSE Demonstration Point completeness:Arup to review the database to extract evidence ratings against asset categories, pressure tiers and NSI themes/sub-themes/asset categories.Calculate average scores based on HSE Demonstration Points and L2 sub-requirements. Consideration to be given to weighted average approach to prevent unbalanced scoring. Approach to be agreed with al Network Partners.Provide overview to DESNZ on how well the NSI Demonstration Points have been addressed. The outputs from the database will feed into the Hydrogen Network Safety project.WP5: Review of evidence (DNV)Review new evidence and updated evidence summary tables:DNV to review new evidence on key projects including HyDeploy, MOBs, LTS Futures, HRC Phase 2 and Cast Iron.Review outputs from the International Evidence project and incorporate all relevant evidence.Review knowledge gaps, focus on critical evidence, identify potential replacement of assets.WP6: DESNZ review (DNV)Liaison with DESNZ on evidence reviews:DNV to issue evidence for updated asset categories that require review.Send evidence to DESNZ in order of prioritisation. The aims and objectives of this project are to:Add new evidence and projects into the database.Improve the usability of the database including access to results and review of scoring.Complete assessments of the new evidence.Revise knowledge gaps and include identification of potential replacements of assets where appropriate.Determine the overall state of evidence. | |
| Abstract | This project will look to continue and improve upon the work of NIA2_SGN0025 Interventions for Hydrogen by Asset Group (Asset Interventions) by undertaking additional assessments of the new evidence from Hydrogen Heating Programme (HHP) projects completed since the end of phase 2c and by incorporating any relevant international evidence. The format of the database will also be enhanced to enable easier access to the key points and to review the scoring using a new weighted average method, which will improve accuracy. Summaries of the evidence within the database will also be produced against the HSE Demonstration (D) points and the Evidence Management System (EMS) level 2 sub-requirements to provide an overview to DESNZ on the completeness of the NSI D points. | |
| Data | No related datasets |
|
| Projects | No related projects |
|
| Publications | No related publications |
|
| Added to Database | 09/04/25 | |
