UKERC Energy Data Centre: ETI Publications

UKERC Home >> EDC Home >> ETI Publications >> Back to Results >> WP2 Manchester Local Area Energy Strategy: Selection of a Local Authority Area for EnergyPath Networks Study - Briefing Report

WP2 Manchester Local Area Energy Strategy: Selection of a Local Authority Area for EnergyPath Networks Study - Briefing Report


Citation Energy Systems Catapult WP2 Manchester Local Area Energy Strategy: Selection of a Local Authority Area for EnergyPath Networks Study - Briefing Report, ETI, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5286/UKERC.EDC.000563.
Cite this using DataCite
Author(s) Energy Systems Catapult
Project partner(s) Energy Systems Catapult
Publisher ETI
DOI https://doi.org/10.5286/UKERC.EDC.000563
Download AdHoc_SSH_SS9007_10.pdf document type
Associated Project(s) ETI-SS9007: Smart Systems and Heat (SSH) Programme - Manchester Local Area Energy Strategy
Associated Dataset(s) No associated datasets
Abstract The Spatial Energy Plan for Greater Manchester Combined Authority project was commissioned as part of the Energy Technologies Institute (ETI) Smart Systems and Heat Programme and undertaken through collaboration between the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and the Energy Systems Catapult. The study has consolidated the significant data and existing evidence relating to the local energy system to provide a platform for future energy planning in the region and the development of suitable policies within the emerging spatial planning framework for Greater Manchester.

As part of the Smart Systems and Heat Programme the Energy Systems Catapult has undertaken a strategic high level study of the energy system in Greater Manchester, with the intention of delivering an EnergyPath Networks study for one of the local authorities in Greater Manchester. The purpose of this document is to set out the different factors which could be included in selecting that local authority and the results of initial analysis of those factors completed by the Energy Systems Catapult.

From the analysis, the report concludes that Bury has highest score for consideration factors and modelling complexity, followed by Trafford. Manchester would be very challenging to analyse, and may prove beyond the capability of the model at its current state of development.