Projects
Projects: Projects for Investigator |
||
| Reference Number | EP/H051139/1 | |
| Title | Community Innovation in Sustainable Energy | |
| Status | Completed | |
| Energy Categories | Energy Efficiency(Residential and commercial) 33%; Renewable Energy Sources(Solar Energy) 10%; Renewable Energy Sources(Wind Energy) 10%; Renewable Energy Sources(Bio-Energy) 8%; Renewable Energy Sources(Hydropower) 5%; Other Cross-Cutting Technologies or Research(Environmental, social and economic impacts) 34%; |
|
| Research Types | Basic and strategic applied research 100% | |
| Science and Technology Fields | SOCIAL SCIENCES (Economics and Econometrics) 25%; SOCIAL SCIENCES (Sociology) 75%; |
|
| UKERC Cross Cutting Characterisation | Sociological economical and environmental impact of energy (Consumer attitudes and behaviour) 75%; Sociological economical and environmental impact of energy (Other sociological economical and environmental impact of energy) 25%; |
|
| Principal Investigator |
Dr AP (Adrian ) Smith No email address given Science Policy Research Unit University of Sussex |
|
| Award Type | Standard | |
| Funding Source | EPSRC | |
| Start Date | 01 October 2010 | |
| End Date | 31 March 2014 | |
| Duration | 42 months | |
| Total Grant Value | £514,617 | |
| Industrial Sectors | Construction; Energy | |
| Region | South East | |
| Programme | Energy Multidisciplinary Applications, User-Led Research | |
| Investigators | Principal Investigator | Dr AP (Adrian ) Smith , Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex (99.999%) |
| Other Investigator | Prof J (Jim ) Watson , Bartlett Sch of Env, Energy & Resources, University College London (0.001%) |
|
| Recognised Researcher | Dr LM (Lee ) Stapleton , Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Brighton (0.000%) |
|
| Industrial Collaborator | Project Contact , EDF Energy (0.000%) |
|
| Web Site | ||
| Objectives | Linked to grant EP/H050930/1 | |
| Abstract | Community-led sustainable energy projects are flourishing in the UK. Community projects involve local groups developing low carbon energy solutions appropriate to local situations, and with community groups having ownership over outcomes. Examples include solar water heating clubs, or insulation clubs, which provide mutual support for system installation; energy awareness and behaviour networks,which provide guidance and reassurance to neighbours on energy matters relevant to them; and co-operatively-owned small-scale renewable energy systems, such as micro-hydro and wind. The Government's Low Carbon Community Challenge joins a portfolio of policies helping innovative community projects. It is argued these will nurture local support for wider processes of low carbon energy transition. Intermediary organizations, such as local and national energy agencies, span local groups through their technical advice, and helping new community projects access resources and networks. If renewed policy interest is to lead to effective institutional support, then evidence is needed about community diffusion processes, performance, and interaction with mainstream energy systems.Independent academic analysis struggles to keep pace with the extent of innovation or to document the diversity of community activity involved. Little is known about the conditions under which community-led innovations do or do not diffuse. The processes by which similar projects replicate in different communities remain unclear. Opportunities for scaling-up projects so that follow-on projects benefit wider setsof local community are similarly obscure. And the possibilities that community-led innovations may provide adaptable and appropriable sustainability solutions that can be translated into mainstream energy market settings has yet to be seriously considered. Our aim is to analyse community energy in order to understand its diffusion and explain its potential in wider energy transitions. We dividecommunity energy into three broad fields - community renewable, community demand reduction, and community awareness-raising/behaviour-support. We wish to see whether diffusion over the last ten years in each field is leading to the development of standard community models that replicate more readily, can be scaled-up, or can be translated into mainstream business settings.We will meet this aim through an engaged research approach that will deliver on four specific objectives: 1. Analysehow diverse community-led projects diffuse through processes of replication, scaling-up, and translation; 2. Evaluate the performance of local community energy projects and assess their potential in wider low carbon transition processes (using UK Foresight scenarios); 3. Provide critical reflection and empirically-backed recommendations for national policy-makers and key energy companies on how to support community approaches to everyone's mutual benefit; 4. Develop and advance innovationtheory appropriate to community-led sustainable energy.A web-based survey will be complemented with in-depth case studies. Interviews with community energy intermediaries, policy-makers and businesses will complement a content analysis of 'best practice' reports. Stakeholder workshops will develop four UK Foresight scenarios for community involvement in energy and the built environment in the future, and their contribution to different low carbon transition pathways. Final analysis andsynthesis will lead to clear recommendations for policy. Our proposal contributes to the EPSRC-EdF call on the social and economic sciences of People, Energy and Buildings by: a) explaining how local communities intervene in energy systems; b) quantifying their role in the diffusion of energy efficient technologies and local renewable energy; and c) assessing how community energy projects could contribute to UK energy systems under a range of future scenarios | |
| Publications | (none) |
|
| Final Report | (none) |
|
| Added to Database | 09/07/10 | |
