Abstract:
The dependence of cities on intensive consumption of energy from fossil fuels is a major cause of climate disruption, and there is increasing interest in the potential for city governments to facilitate a transition to sustainable energy. Little is known, however, about the extent or structures of current urban energy initiatives. Our paper addresses this gap by mapping UK local authority energy plans and project investments and exploring governance processes in three leading cities. It uses socio-technical and urban studies’ perspectives on neo-liberal governing and energy systems to interpret findings. This reveals both the gap between local ambitions and capacity to implement plans, and the potential for translation of neo-liberal governing into contrasting commercial and community urban energy enterprises, prefiguring different energy futures. Overall, however, the neo-liberalframework is associated with small scale and uneven initiatives, with limited contribution to a systemic shift to sustainable cities.
Publication Year:
2016
Publisher:
Cities, 54: 28-35
Author(s):
Webb, J., Hawkey, D. and Tingey, M.
Energy Category
Class Name:
Subclass Name:
Category Name:
Language:
English
File Type:
application/pdf
File Size:
444447 B
Rights:
Energy Technologies Institute Open Licence for Materials
Rights Overview:
The Energy Technologies Institute is making this document available to use under the Energy Technologies Institute Open Licence for Materials. Please refer to the Energy Technologies Institute website for the terms and conditions of this licence. The Information is licensed "as is" and the Energy Technologies Institute excludes all representations, warranties, obligations and liabilities in relation to the Information to the maximum extent permitted by law. The Energy Technologies Institute is not liable for any errors or omissions in the Information and shall not be liable for any loss, injury or damage of any kind caused by its use. This exclusion of liability includes, but is not limited to, any direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive, or exemplary damages in each case such as loss of revenue, data, anticipated profits, and lost business. The Energy Technologies Institute does not guarantee the continued supply of the Information. Notwithstanding any statement to the contrary contained on the face of this document, the Energy Technologies Institute confirms that it has the right to publish this document.
Further information:
N/A
Region:
United Kingdom
Publication Type:
Subject:
Theme(s):
Cross Cutting Programme (Strategy)
Related Dataset(s):
Related Project(s):